Token effort

It might just be because I slept badly and am feeling a little worn out and grumpy, but I’m getting annoyed with friends’ facebook status updates today.  Specifically: I’m seeing a lot of female friends who have agreed to ‘increase the awareness of breast cancer’ (as it was described in a message sent to me) by posting, as a status update, the place where they like their handbag to be located.  In other words, my news feed is full of status updates like ‘Mary likes it by the front door’ and ‘Jennifer likes it on the sofa’.  A similar viral ‘awareness’ thing took place last October and a lot of women posted a status update which said nothing more than the colour of their bra.  As that same message to me pointed out, ‘the bra game made it to the news’.

Now – of course – I’m all in favour of people raising awareness of important causes.  What bothers me is the idea that doing something like this is a worthwhile activity in itself.  ‘Raising awareness’ is only worthwhile is something happens as a result of the awareness being raised.  For example, most charities try to raise awareness of their cause because they want people to donate money to that cause.  My concern is that 99% of the women writing these ‘I like it’ status updates are doing nothing more than that: if they were ‘raising awareness’ AND making a donation to a good breast cancer charity, fantastic.  But I fear that this probably isn’t the case (although I’m still resisting the urge to actually ask some of them outright, in a comment under the relevant status update.  I don’t want to embarrass my friends.)

I’ve noticed this kind of thing before on Facebook – in particular, people ‘liking’ a charity’s page, as if that’s the same thing as supporting it.  It isn’t the same thing.  The entire world could write ‘I like it’ status updates to raise awareness of breast cancer, but it wouldn’t make an ounce of difference when it comes to actually discovering a cure to the disease.  And really, does the Western world need their awareness of breast cancer raised?  Surely everybody knows that breast cancer is a horrible thing and that money and time should be devoted to researching treatments and cures?

When it comes to things that are commonly considered ‘good’ I think there’s a real danger of people mistaking token efforts for proper efforts.  The entire ‘supermarkets discouraging customers from using plastic bags’ situation is a good case in point.  I remember watching a news story about Sainsbury’s supermarket trying to phase out plastic bags and encourage customers towards reusable bags.  The BBC couldn’t find an environmental charity willing to come on screen and endorse the initiative and for good reason: it doesn’t actually make a huge amount of difference to the state of the world and the relevant charities fear that people will think, ‘oh, I’m using a recyclable bag at Sainsbury’s and that means that I’m environmentally friendly’.  In other words, it’s a token effort that tricks people into thinking that they’re saving the world: it doesn’t encourage the real behavioural change required (in the case of environmental stuff; driving less, flying less, not wasting water, not buying crappy, disposable products, etc).  It’s like people who give money to Oxfam and then buy their clothes from Primark.  A small gesture doesn’t make a blind bit of difference if your wider actions lack thought.

To avoid writing a scathing facebook comment and risk losing half of my friends (hey, what can I tell you?  I like being liked!), I’ve written this status update:

Jacquelyn loves facebook user-led initiatives to raise awareness of certain causes. However, it would be even cooler if everybody who takes part also made a financial donation to a good, relevant charity: raising awareness is fab, but funding the research needed to cure diseases is even better!

Maybe a good way forward would be for every woman who has posted one of the ‘I like it’ status updates to donate the value of their monthly broadband subscription?

11 Responses to Token effort

  1. S@sha says:

    I completely agree with you that giving to a charity is much more important than supporting one publicly, however I also think that facebook is super shallow by nature, and therefore you shouldn’t assume that your friends haven’t made a donation in addition to posting their “where they like it,” comments. What disturbs me about both of the campaigns you mentioned is the idea that in our society you have to sexualize a cause to make it cool. I know its supposed to be funny and clever, but I just find it sexist. We don’t see “sexy” campaigns regarding testicular cancer or prostate cancer.

    • exilednzer says:

      Sasha, you’re quite right: I do think that most of my real friends will have donated as well. It’s the idea that doing something like this is, in itself, a worthwhile thing that bothers me – the message I was sent about it didn’t include any information about donating, finding information about breast cancer, or anything other than ‘write this status update and people will wonder what you’re on about’.

      And the point you make about sexualising a cause is such a valid one. Jackie Danicki sent me this blog link, which you will find interesting, I think:

      • Franziska says:

        Thanks for posting this link. I’ve reposted it on facebook now. I might piss off a few people but at the same time my friends know that I say what I think, so there you go!

  2. Franziska says:

    Reminds me of the Herbal Essence ads that were shown just before Desperate Housewives started. “Lucy likes to do it after playing mixed doubles”.

    Still, not as bad as trying to sex up messages to raise awareness of cancer.

  3. S@sha says:

    I just wanted to chime back in to say that this entire campaign was made a bit more trickier for me by the fact that the facebook request that I received was from a college friend of mine who is a breast cancer survivor. I didn’t write my “where I like it” status update, but I felt a little guilty about it. That annoys me since I think the entire campaign is really awful, ugh. The modern world. So complicated.

  4. S@sha says:

    Oh, and also I realize that “more trickier” is bad grammar, but I don’t seem able to edit my comment.

  5. ana says:

    I’m with you on this one! I haven’t entered into either of the campaigns, despite a number of message requests. I just find it all a bit silly and I’m not at all convinced that it’s a useful way to ‘raise awareness’ or encourage people to make a real contribution?
    Ana x(by the way!)

  6. ana says:

    sorry, thought my comment may have come up as from Russell!

  7. Freddo says:

    What’s with all this prim talk of ‘sexualising,’ ‘sexism’ and ‘sexing up’?
    Honestly, I can hear your lips pursing from here!
    You lot are no fun any more.
    Really, you’re beginning to sound like your mothers!

  8. S@sha says:

    Actually, my mom’s youth being the hippie era of the 60s and 70s, makes her a lot less prim than I am. It’s more like sounding like my grandmothers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: